Recommend
Print

Managing people

Fair Work Act, Flexibility Clauses Criticised By Business Groups For Being Unworkable: Legal Matters

Fair Work’s flexibility clauses slammed as “unworkable”

By Michelle Hammond
Tuesday, 31 January 2012

Business groups have criticised the Fair Work Ombudsman for failing to properly administer flexibility clauses in the Fair Work Act, claiming small business owners need more guidance.

 

Flexibility clauses enable employers and employees to negotiate their own agreements relating to working hours and rates of pay.

 

Clauses introduced by Fair Work Australia are designed offer business owners a way in which to ease spikes in labour costs resulting from public holidays, weekends and overtime.

 

Such clauses allow businesses to pay staff a year-round flat rate, higher than the award wage, in lieu of penalty rates and holiday loading.

 

This enables them to extend their opening hours or to remain open on public holidays.

 

But according to Gary Black, executive director of the National Retail Association, the flexibility clauses in the Fair Work Act are a “sham” and “completely ineffective”.

 

Black has criticised the clauses for their lack of practicality on an enterprise level, and poor administration by the Fair Work Ombudsman.

 

“An employee or employer can sit down in good faith and devise an agreement that is suitable for both, but there is no way they can know at the time of entering into the agreement whether it is valid,” Black told The Australian Financial Review.

 

“Later on, the Fair Work Ombudsman can come in and say, ‘No, we don’t think the no-disadvantage test has been met here, the agreement is invalid’ and you have to back pay the higher wage in retrospect.”

 

“It’s an entirely unworkable agreement, particularly for small businesses. They’re just not going to take the risk.”

 

According to a spokesperson for the Ombudsman, it is the employer’s responsibility to ensure that the individual flexibility arrangement (IFA) meets all the requirements of the Fair Work Act.

 

“IFAs do not need to be approved by Fair Work Australia,” the spokesperson says.

 

“[However,] if an employer fails to ensure that an IFA is properly made in accordance with the Fair Work Act, they may be liable to a penalty of up to $6,600 for an individual or $33,000 if the employer is a body corporate.”

 

Peter Strong, executive director of the Council of Small Business of Australia, says business owners face a dilemma when deciding between a flexible agreement and paying penalty rates.

 

“They’re faced with the decision: do I break the law or do I shut my shop and not look after my employees who want to work on a Sunday?” he says.

 

“If entering into these agreements were that easy, a lot of [small businesses] would’ve already done it. All it takes is the Fair Work Ombudsman to help them do it.”

Did you like this article? 

Sign up to the StartupSmart Newsletter to receive a daily news wrap-up straight to your inbox AND a free eBook!

Invalid Input

Comments (1)

Subscribe to this comment's feed
0
I am someone who strongly opposes using individual agreements for the purpose of splintering the workforce and using individual bargaining to reduce employee entitlements, as we saw quite a bit in the retail and other award reliant sectors under Work Choices. However I do think there can be room for individual arrangements, in fact the Fair Work Act already provides some scope for this. However where this article is on the money is that employers and employees have little knowledge or practical guidance in regards to how to get these individual agreements working for their business. What is also lacking is certainty, with a strong argument for longer nominal timeframes for individual flexibility arrangements to apply once agreed to. Enterprise bargaining is the best way to deliver genuine productivity because it is much more efficient to drive productive change to a group of employees working together then it is to try and work out how each individual employee can be more productive. AWA's only covered 3-5% of employees at their zenith and were fairly uncontroversial until the no-disadvantage test was abolished, allowing for cheap, easy cost savings by cutting wages. These practices were not innovative or effecient at all in that they did nothing to boost productive output, rather they simply saved business money by cutting wages. Individual agreements have a place, allowing both employer and employee a degree of flexibile negotiation without undermining prevailing overall conditions. It would be beneficial for some guides or templates to be produced to assist the parties to make use of the tools available.
Ben Stephens , February 01, 2012

Write comment

smaller | bigger

busy
Invalid Input
 

Follow us

StartupSmart on Twitter StartupSmart on Facebook StartupSmart on LinkedIn StartupSmart on Google+

Subscribe to StartupSmart RSS feeds

Events


  • Recruiting and Managing Top Talent
    A good team all working with focus to achieve a startup's mission can make or break a start up. Finding, recruiting and managing top talent are core skills for...

  • Nailing the Pitch
    You have spent many months building out your product, testing your MVP and refining your marketing funnels, now it's time to take this bad boy to the next...

  • Introduction to Mobile Marketing
    Got a great idea for a mobile app that will revolutionize the way people find the best Mexican restaurants nearest to them? Have you hacked the next angry...

  • Getting Your Startup in Top Tier Tech News
    Getting your product in front of users as cost effectively as possible is essential for start ups and the right article in the right top tier tech publication...

  • How to Build a Mobile App
    Whether you're a business person responsible for figuring out your mobile strategy or a developer looking for an overview of mobile based development options...

Sponsored Links

Our Partners

 

Private Media Publications

Crikey

loading...

Crikey Blogs

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

Property Observer

loading...

Leading Company

loading...