Recommend
Print

Intellectual property

Business Insider takes NSW start-up to court over name

US media company Business Insider takes NSW start-up to court over name

By Oliver Milman
Monday, 04 February 2013

A NSW online media start-up has been hit by legal action taken by a similarly named rival, New York-based firm The Business Insider, which claims the Australian enterprise is guilty of “misleading and deceptive” conduct by using the moniker.

 

Via a Brisbane-based lawyer, The Business Insider Inc has launched proceedings in the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia against Business Insider Pty Ltd.

 

The latter business, launched in 2011, operates two websites focused on regional NSW small businesses – the Central Coast Business Insider and the Hunter Business Insider.

 

The company also had a general website, businessinsider.net, but took this down following the legal action to emphasise the local nature of its operation.

 

New York-based The Business Insider, created in 2009 by entrepreneur Henry Blodget, says it has 23 million unique visitors a month and now has substantial interests in Australia.

 

Allure Media, a subsidiary of Fairfax Media, has the rights to publish a local version The Business Insider. Chris Janz, managing director of Allure Media, tells StartupSmart: “We’re not a party to the proceedings so cannot comment.”

 

However, Mark Cleary, who co-founded the Australian version of Business Insider with Bob Fitzgerald and Dean Collins, claims that Fairfax’s involvement is crucial in the court case, even though the media company isn’t behind the legal action.

 

“To me, this smacks of Fairfax getting the rights to Business Insider and New York saying ‘we’ve got these turkeys up on the central coast, let’s get rid of them.’ A bit of housekeeping, if you like,” he tells StartupSmart.

 

“It’s a peculiar one because there has to be a victim for misleading conduct. I’m not sure that big advertisers are getting confused between New York and Gosford. My first reaction to this was ‘have you got us confused with someone else?’”

 

“As far as I’m aware, there are sites called Business Insider in the UK and WA. Our advice is that this is such a common term that there can’t be a case.”

 

“We’ve gone back to the sites to emphasise the local nature of them. Logically that should be enough, but legally, who knows. We don’t feel there’s misrepresentation.”

 

Cleary says that there’s a court date set for the end of February, where the New York Business Insider will seek damages.

 

“It’s all been at arm’s length really, via a solicitor, whereby I’d probably prefer someone just calling me up for a chat over coffee over this. They’ve suggested damages. If they want to share some of our losses to date, they’d be very welcome.”

Did you like this article? 

Sign up to the StartupSmart Newsletter to receive a daily news wrap-up straight to your inbox AND a free eBook!

Invalid Input

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Write comment

smaller | bigger

busy
SmartSolo-Tile
Invalid Input
 
SmartCompany Smart Reads
  • Facebook updates the News Feed: Everything businesses need to know (and you really need to...
  • Tablets overtake smartphones as preferred web browsing device
  • Microsoft patent battle could lead to Google Maps ban in Germany
  • VIDEO: Nokia demonstrates 3D phone case printing live
  • Telstra launches mobile carrier-independent NRL streaming video smartphone app

Follow us

StartupSmart on Twitter StartupSmart on Facebook StartupSmart on LinkedIn StartupSmart on Google+

Subscribe to StartupSmart RSS feeds

Sponsored Links

Our Partners

SmartSolo sign up
 

Private Media Publications

Crikey

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

Property Observer

loading...

Leading Company

loading...

Womens Agenda

loading...