{"id":32821,"date":"2023-10-20T14:29:12","date_gmt":"2023-10-20T14:29:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/startupsmart.test\/2023\/10\/20\/amazon-puts-its-feud-with-the-new-york-times-and-its-workplace-culture-back-in-the-spotlight-startupsmart\/"},"modified":"2023-10-20T14:29:12","modified_gmt":"2023-10-20T14:29:12","slug":"amazon-puts-its-feud-with-the-new-york-times-and-its-workplace-culture-back-in-the-spotlight-startupsmart","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.startupsmart.com.au\/uncategorized\/amazon-puts-its-feud-with-the-new-york-times-and-its-workplace-culture-back-in-the-spotlight-startupsmart\/","title":{"rendered":"Amazon puts its feud with the New York Times, and its workplace culture, back in the spotlight – StartupSmart"},"content":{"rendered":"
More than two months after the New York Times <\/i>published a highly critical article<\/a> on the workplace conditions and culture of Amazon, the feud between the two companies has been reignited.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n The original NY Times<\/i> piece<\/a> was the product of a six-month investigation from two journalists and exposed \u201cbruising\u201d conditions Amazon employees are required to work under.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Now senior vice president for global corporate affairs at Amazon Jay Carney has brought the story back into the news by questioning the credibility of the article in a post on Medium<\/i><\/a>.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cEven with breaking news, journalistic standards would encourage working hard to uncover any bias in a key source,\u201d Carney writes.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cWith six months to work on the story, journalistic standards absolutely require it.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cWhy did the Times<\/em> choose not to follow standard practices here?\u201d<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Carney\u2019s argument centres on the credibility of four of the named sources in the NY Times<\/i> piece. His rebuttal includes some personal details about their employment history and performance evaluations, an interesting move from a company that is trying to encourage its employees to raise concerns with their superiors and shed its reputation of being a bad place to work.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n New York Times<\/i> executive editor Dean Baquet quickly wrote a Medium piece in reply<\/a>, reiterating his full support for the original piece and pointing to \u201cmore than a hundred\u201d sources that were interviewed for it.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cThis story was based on dozens of interviews,\u201d Baquet writes.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cAny reading of these responses leaves no doubt that this was an accurate portrait.\u201d<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n